IMF bailout is a growing concern in the international economic community. It involves providing financial assistance to countries facing severe economic crises by imposing structural reforms that include cutting budget deficits, limiting domestic credit expansion, increasing exports and privatizing state-owned enterprises.
There are three popular methodologies used in investigating the effectiveness of IMF bailouts. One is to compare the economic performance of a country before and after it participated in an IMF program. The other two approaches involve using a control country as the benchmark against which to measure the impact of an IMF program. The results of these studies are mixed, with some showing that IMF bailouts are effective while others find no discernible benefit from IMF participation.
Most of the research into IMF bailouts finds that they have a negative impact on recipient countries. These negative effects can be attributed to several factors. First, IMF loans create moral hazard by underwriting otherwise unsustainable government policies and reducing the pressure on governments to undertake necessary institutional and policy reforms. In Mexico, for example, successive IMF programs encouraged the ruling bureaucracy to avoid implementing required institutional reforms for decades.
IMF loan programs also have a tendency to impose overly harsh austerity packages that are not matched to a recipient country’s economic status and culture. These policies can further exacerbate the weak economic situation of bailed-out countries and lead to more debt vulnerability, poverty and inequality.
About the Author
